[Home]History of Jewish eschatology/Talk

HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences

Revision 10 . . December 5, 2001 1:05 am by (logged).155.160.xxx [Why are people focusing on Tertullian? I think the real point is being overlooked]
Revision 9 . . December 4, 2001 10:45 pm by MichaelTinkler [comparing tertullian to origen.]
Revision 8 . . December 4, 2001 10:33 pm by (logged).153.24.xxx
Revision 7 . . December 4, 2001 1:34 pm by Wesley
Revision 6 . . December 4, 2001 1:21 pm by RK
Revision 5 . . (edit) December 4, 2001 1:17 pm by Wesley [(forgot to attribute my posts)]
Revision 4 . . December 4, 2001 1:16 pm by Wesley [More regarding Tertullian, and (Offtopic) Elijah in Christian eschatology]
Revision 3 . . December 4, 2001 7:46 am by RK
Revision 2 . . December 4, 2001 7:13 am by Ed Poor [question re: Elijah's role]
Revision 1 . . December 4, 2001 6:47 am by (logged).146.101.xxx [Tertullian a church father??]
  

Difference (from prior major revision) (no other diffs)

Changed: 7c7,13
:::I don't know what kind of Catholics you've talked to about Tertullian, RK, but I have never met a modern Catholic who believed in the veiling of women, to give one example, RK. Tertullian is not mainstream. He died in schism - he was a Montanist. His position on private revelation is entirely outside the bounds of the church. He is not a saint in the West. He is considered a 'Father' only in the sense that he wrote during the third century. His influence was at its high point in the 17th and 18th century in France among the Jansenists, who shared both his puritan tendencies and his practice of trusting in private revelation. I think his position vis-a-vis the Roman Church is remarkably similar to that of Origen to the Orthodox. --MichaelTinkler
:::I don't know what kind of Catholics you've talked to about Tertullian, RK, but I have never met a modern Catholic who believed in the veiling of women, to give one example, RK. Tertullian is not mainstream.

::: You totally misread what I wrote. I was talking about his theology. RK

:::He died in schism - he was a Montanist. His position on private revelation is entirely outside the bounds of the church. He is not a saint in the West. He is considered a 'Father' only in the sense that he wrote during the third century. His influence was at its high point in the 17th and 18th century in France among the Jansenists, who shared both his puritan tendencies and his practice of trusting in private revelation. I think his position vis-a-vis the Roman Church is remarkably similar to that of Origen to the Orthodox. --MichaelTinkler

::: You miss my point. None of these things that you mention have anything to do with the specific topic at hand. Most Christians alive today are not Saints, either. But they do have viewpoints on the trinity. Many Christians alive today have the viewpoint that I described. No one is deabting whether or not Tertullian views on other issues were acceprted. In fact, no one was talking about Tertullian at all. Rather, I was merely giving an example of a mainstream Christian concept. Everyone else seems concerned with the particular person, but they are ignoring the idea, the main point of all this. The view expressed by Tertullian on Jesus is still a very widely held belief among Chrisitians. It, thus, is representative. I fail to understand the controversy. RK

HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences
Search: