What Google Likes | What Nupedia Wants | Requested articles | Brilliant prose |
SandBox | R P Sandbox | Wiki special characters | [edit lock?] |
In progress: | [Dept of State stuff] | status here | |
Joris Ivens | Dziga Vertov | ||
punch up | As We May Think | ||
eradicate non-META subpages | |||
Countries of the world | through :Afghanistan |
But I don't think it would make sense to separate parts of it, at least not for most of it. Many of the topics in the 'pedia will obsolesce sooner or later, and just require vigilance. Even the PG discussion of Algeria from 90 years ago is largely inaccurate due to changing borders, so I think it's a more general problem than the CIA bits. Perhaps something like [[Current government officials of *]] would help, or maybe we could just link to sites charging themselves with maintaining that data. I'm very interested in suggestions on this front. --KQ
Netscape and Microsoft Internet Explorer ask you if you want to download foreign fonts, if say you are trying to look at a Chinese site and you don't have chinese fonts. If you have an older browser maybe it's time to upgrade, and yes it's free. Thanks again. Enjoy standard =) -BF
So what? I know about the fonts, thank you. Why should I care what font you want to look at it in? Change it on your machine, and leave everyone else's alone. --KQ
KQ - I'll go one step further - I don't think "font" tags EVER belong in an article. To me the talk pages are irrelevant and you can do whatever you want, they are just the "doodle pads" of the encyclopedia and will all get deleted when the revolution comes. I think BF is slowly coming to realise the curious joys of participating in an anarcho-syndicalist commune... she can do whatever she wants... and so can we! - cheers MB
Leave fonts alone on pages you contribute nothing to. Unless you want wingdings as default here. You want to complain ? I will also.
All pages on wikipedia are under public ownership, and KQ has as much of a say about any of them as do you. At the same time, holding pages ransom is callous and shows a strong lack of respect for your peers. If you were only more cooperative, I'm sure your contributions would be welcomed.
Btw: while the topic has been brought up, do we suppose that font tags might actually be appropriate for providing samples in pages about scripts - Arial?, serif?, and so forth, once they have been created? It seems a little wasteful to go to the trouble of creating an image file, but then again it doesn't presume that the user has such-and-such a font set on their computer, so it might be preferrable.
If you are browsing with images turned off, you shouldn't expect to see any pictures. ;) I think you're probably right.
--Actually, the point might be moot anyway for people in text-only browsers: are different fonts an option? If not, those users would just have to see it in print, or on a different computer.
Hm. My OAD doesn't list it, but the OED does, and doesn't make any comment on it. I've always seen it with just one e; perhaps that's a, uh, United-Statesianism. <g> --KQ
I understand! -- GWO
Oh. I didn't see your request on the Recent Changes page. Sorry, I wasn't ignoring you. :-)
Whatever software created your original image put information into the PNG file about the brightness and color response curves, i.e., "Gamma" and "Chromaticity", that had illegal values (in particular, a gamma of 0.0, which is an exponent of the brightness response curve, making it flat). Internet Explorer 5 was the only browser correctly interpreting that, and rendering the blank image; less sophisticated browsers generally ignore gamma and chromaticity information because you can get a decent image ignoring them. I removed that information, because without it the defaults are fine--bad information is much worse than none. It also made the file smaller. It's also a grayscale image saved with a color palette, so it could be made smaller still with a bit more work. Please let the programmer who created that software know about his mistake so it can be fixed. --LDC
Here it is with the palette removed (about 23% smaller). --Zundark, 2001 Nov 14
Thanks, both. :-) --KQ
I haven't noticed you around much, either. How have you been? --KQ
Busy, my daughter was born about a month and a half ago, and I still don't get back on track....not sure if I ever will :) So, I have not been working in new articles, just checking what appears, specially in my area, repairing vandalism and asking questions...more like editor that writer....and for as little time as I'm able to (just one more edit....:))--AN