|
Making stuff for its own ends - ArtsAndEntertainment? |
|
Making stuff for its own ends - ArtsAndEntertainment? The point of having a computerized encyclopedia is not to face some of the traditionnal dilemma of the Editor-In-Chief: meeting the deadline, having a fixed list of articles, publishing a fixed work, having only one table of contents. I think that apart from quite rational CategorySchemes we should encourage many apparently non-sensical categorizations and make them available through a variant of the CategorySchemes and/or of the PatentNonsense page, like this one: #Things written by BryceHarrington #Things having kept a wEiRDcAPITALIZATion? in wikiwiki #Things whose name is badly spelt by most #Things whose shape or color has a cute name in shwahili #Birds that cannot fly #Subjects alluded to in more than two of the above categories #People not wanting to be classified as things #Objects not wanting to be called by any other name #Objects that can be thrown at someone you despise #Savoir-vivre manuals #Mirrors, Queens and Rabbits #Miscelleaneous and Dinosaurs --OprgaG |
![[Home]](wikipedia.png)