History of Superfetation

	Revision 9 . . December 5, 2001 3:57 am by MichaelTinkler [revising the superfoetation qualification]
	Revision 8 . . (edit) December 4, 2001 10:23 pm by (logged).153.24.xxx
	Revision 7 . . December 4, 2001 4:15 pm by ManningBartlett [it's bloody wrong, but I've put in the compromised version]
	Revision 6 . . December 4, 2001 9:47 am by (logged).109.250.xxx [if the spelling "superfoetation" occurs in some dictionaries, it is not incorrect]
	Revision 5 . . (edit) December 4, 2001 8:22 am by The Anome [linkity...]
	Revision 4 . . December 4, 2001 8:21 am by The Anome [marked other spelling as incorrect]
	Revision 3 . . December 2, 2001 9:21 pm by (logged).109.250.xxx [since this word is sometimes spelt with an o, we should at least note that, be the spelling etymologically correct or not]
	Revision 2 . . December 2, 2001 1:15 pm by ManningBartlett [moved]
	Revision 1 . . December 2, 2001 1:15 pm by ManningBartlett [moved]

---

Difference (from prior major revision) (no other diffs)

Changed: 1c1

Superfetation (also spelt Superfoetation, though some argue this is etymologically incorrect, see fetus) refers to the formation of a fetus while another fetus is already present in the uterus. It is common in some species of animals, but is extremely rare in humans. It can only occur where there are two uteri, or where the [menstrual cycle]? continues through pregnancy.

Superfetation (also spelt Superfoetation, based on a false etymology - see fetus) refers to the formation of a fetus while another fetus is already present in the uterus. It is common in some species of animals, but is extremely rare in humans. It can only occur where there are two uteri, or where the [menstrual cycle]? continues through pregnancy.

Changed: 3c3

/Talk?

/Talk?