[Home]History of Scientific Mythology/Talk

HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences

Revision 19 . . December 15, 2001 4:08 am by Larry Sanger
Revision 18 . . December 15, 2001 4:07 am by Ed Poor [ben, let's slow down]
Revision 17 . . December 15, 2001 4:06 am by Ed Poor [ben, let's slow down]
Revision 16 . . December 15, 2001 4:05 am by BenBaker
Revision 15 . . December 15, 2001 3:57 am by Ed Poor [think on Taw's proposal, gentlemen]
Revision 14 . . December 15, 2001 3:53 am by Chenyu
Revision 13 . . December 15, 2001 3:51 am by Lee Daniel Crocker
Revision 12 . . December 15, 2001 3:42 am by Lee Daniel Crocker
Revision 11 . . December 15, 2001 3:36 am by BenBaker [*conversation.]
Revision 10 . . December 15, 2001 3:28 am by Lee Daniel Crocker
Revision 9 . . December 15, 2001 3:23 am by Lee Daniel Crocker
Revision 8 . . December 15, 2001 3:22 am by Chenyu
Revision 7 . . December 15, 2001 3:17 am by Chenyu
Revision 6 . . December 15, 2001 3:11 am by Dmerrill
Revision 5 . . December 15, 2001 3:08 am by BenBaker [*conversation.]
Revision 4 . . December 15, 2001 3:04 am by Lee Daniel Crocker
Revision 3 . . December 15, 2001 3:02 am by Dmerrill [Puhleeeeeze!]
Revision 2 . . December 15, 2001 2:57 am by Ed Poor [good point, but...]
Revision 1 . . December 15, 2001 2:46 am by BenBaker
  

Difference (from prior major revision) (no other diffs)

Added: 108a109,110


I want to register a complaint about this article, on three grounds. First, Ben, it hardly follows that, since "Christian mythology" is apparently fair game on Wikipedia (though you think is inappropriate--and I do too, on NPOV grounds), "scientific mythology" names a topic appropriate for an encyclopedia. In fact, I don't think we should have articles with either name. (I will shortly redirect them as I think is appropriate, since I suspect nobody else will feel bold enough to do so.) Second, as others have said, apparently, you misunderstand what "mythology" means. Myth implies falsehood; many stories you've listed might very well be true. Third, and this is most important: Wikipedia is not the place for original research! As far as I can tell, you have invented the concept of "scientific mythology" and are now stating your theory about it. (If I'm wrong, prove it.) That is not what Wikipedia is for! Hmm. I think a lot of people still don't understand this; I'm going to put an essay about it on Meta-Wikipedia. --LMS

HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences
Search: