[Home]History of Pollutant/Talk

HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences

Revision 7 . . (edit) December 14, 2001 1:55 am by Sodium
Revision 6 . . (edit) December 14, 2001 1:21 am by Sodium
Revision 5 . . (edit) December 14, 2001 1:21 am by Sodium
Revision 4 . . December 14, 2001 1:18 am by Sodium [no]
Revision 3 . . December 14, 2001 1:00 am by Ed Poor [question]
Revision 2 . . November 6, 2001 6:55 pm by Sodium
  

Difference (from prior major revision) (minor diff)

Added: 6a7,10


Actually although CFC is a greenhouse gas, in this article I described it in the context of destruction of the ozone layer, a different problem. Only one paragraph deals with global warming (which is very adequately dealt with elsewhere), and it doesn't support or deny it exists, just states what could happen.

What was the reason for the "held to be damaging" change? It is pretty securely known that CFCs are damaging, hence the massive banning of them. -- sodium

HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences
Search: