[Home]Pollutant/Talk

HomePage | Pollutant | Recent Changes | Preferences

Sodium (I'm saying this here, since your personal page has been inconsiderately hijacked by an element), nice job on this article! I especially like the fact that you didn't combine the concepts of pollutants (the agents themselves) and pollution (which I think should be used to present the effects of pollutants and the efforts (or lack thereof) to deal with them. --STG
Thanks :-). I do actually have a personal page but it is hard to find, accessible through a link on the bottom of the sodium page. --sodium


Global warming gases are the first two examples. Is this article geared mainly toward supporting the Global Warming theory, or what? --Ed Poor
Actually although CFC is a greenhouse gas, in this article I described it in the context of destruction of the ozone layer, a different problem. Only one paragraph deals with global warming (which is very adequately dealt with elsewhere), and it doesn't support or deny it exists, just states what could happen.

What was the reason for the "held to be damaging" change? It is pretty securely known that CFCs are damaging, hence the massive banning of them. -- sodium


HomePage | Pollutant | Recent Changes | Preferences
This page is read-only | View other revisions
Last edited December 14, 2001 1:55 am by Sodium (diff)
Search: