Sodium (I'm saying this here, since your personal page has been inconsiderately hijacked by an
element), nice job on this article! I especially like the fact that you didn't combine the concepts of pollutants (the agents themselves) and
pollution (which I think should be used to present the effects of pollutants and the efforts (or lack thereof) to deal with them. --
STG
Thanks :-). I do actually have a personal page but it is hard to find, accessible through a link on the bottom of the
sodium page. --
sodium
Global warming gases are the first two examples. Is this article geared mainly toward supporting the
Global Warming theory, or what? --
Ed Poor
Actually although CFC is a greenhouse gas, in this article I described it in the context of destruction of the ozone layer, a different problem. Only one paragraph deals with global warming (which is very adequately dealt with
elsewhere), and it doesn't support or deny it exists, just states what could happen.
What was the reason for the "held to be damaging" change? It is pretty securely known that CFCs are damaging, hence the massive banning of them. -- sodium