[Home]History of Architecture/Talk

HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences

Revision 10 . . (edit) November 5, 2001 8:24 pm by MichaelTinkler
Revision 8 . . November 5, 2001 1:21 pm by Plemeljr
  

Difference (from prior major revision) (minor diff)

Added: 13a14
:I love it. Much improved. "Elements" started out as an archeytype list and has been mishandled a little (mainly I've been sticking in stubs for things that needed to be explained). I'll confess that as I progress into middle age I'm more and more of an Archetypicalist, in part because I've tired of the way in which most theorists manage to blather on and on about art or architecture without ever showing a picture. If we're talking about things, let's talk about things. 'Space' in most critical discourse is discourse, not spatial extension around a thinking person. Of course, here on Wikipedia we live without pictures, so 'Relative Homelessness' might work. On the other hand, 'primoridial soup' is a clever description, but a tad condescending to a highly developed theory of architecture that existed before the 20th century. It also implies a kind of 'evolutionism' in thought that I find unhelpful when dealing with anything larger than a cell. --MichaelTinkler

HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences
Search: