[Home]Pollutant/Talk

HomePage | Pollutant | Recent Changes | Preferences

Showing revision 5
Sodium (I'm saying this here, since your personal page has been inconsiderately hijacked by an element), nice job on this article! I especially like the fact that you didn't combine the concepts of pollutants (the agents themselves) and pollution (which I think should be used to present the effects of pollutants and the efforts (or lack thereof) to deal with them. --STG
Thanks :-). I do actually have a personal page but it is hard to find, accessible through a link on the bottom of the sodium page. --sodium


Global warming gases are the first two examples. Is this article geared mainly toward supporting the Global Warming theory, or what? --Ed Poor
Actually although CFC is a greenhouse causing gas, in this article I described it in the context of destruction of the ozone layer, a different problem. Only one paragraph deals with global warming (which is very adequately dealt with elsewhere), and it doesn't support or deny it exists, just states what could happen. --

What was the reason for the "held to be damaging" change? It is pretty securely known that CFCs are damaging, hence the massive banning of them. sodium


HomePage | Pollutant | Recent Changes | Preferences
This page is read-only | View other revisions | View current revision
Edited December 14, 2001 1:21 am by Sodium (diff)
Search: