Is this going to be ever expanded ? The name is quite silly. --Taw
This was a section in the article that also had the Virgin Mary and Mary Magdalene, I thought it best to give those two their own articles, but what to do with this Mary? --SimonP?
I think this should just be removed. I'm sure there is already what little info this article has to offer on the Virgin Mary section. --Jzcool
Its a different Mary, she was important enough to be included in Christian Encyclopedias so she should stay. The bizzare name of the article is the problem. Perhaps 'Mary of Rom. 16:6' would be better? --SimonP?
If it is going to be expanded to more than 1 line maybe. If there is no other info about her, then this article makes no sense. --Taw
Merge this article into the main Mary page, as a subheading? It might not be important enough to stand as its own article, but the information needs to be somewhere. -- dreamyshade
Subheading seems right. --Taw