Moved from main page 2001-08-13. --loh
I've only recently discovered Wikipedia -- really cool. So far, my favorite thing to do is to just
wander around via
Random Page [URL], usually
fixing any minor errors that I see. I've made no significant contributions. -- loh (2001-05-19)
Au contraire, mon frère. Correcting existing entries is a double service, as it increases the
usefulness of Wikipedia twice as much, proportionally, as adding new data. You reorganization
of the FAQ is nice, too. --Lee Daniel Crocker
Thanks. I finally decided to heed, at least a little, the admonition to be bold in updating pages.
--loh
"I'm particularly fond of your succinct entry on Recursion which I just randomly stumbled into --loh"
Cheers ... and it only took three months for anyone to notice it
GWO
I'm glad LDC has already given great praise for correcting entries--I screwed up royally with the
Mississippi River entry in my rush to get at least something for a few of the rivers of North America's great central watershed.
Thanks for the correction. --dja
No problem; I'm sure I have/will provide the same opportunity for someone (heh). --loh
Good to see another
ISO 8601 user. --
drj
Yeah, I wish it were used more; I'm easily enough confused as it is. --loh
I've updated
LR parser and
LALR parser, can you take a look please? Don't forget to
be bold in updating pages. What is most obvious to me is the need to write more stuff! ([Lookahead LR]
?, [Simple LR]
?, [Canonical LR]
?, [context free grammar]
?, and somewhere to explain "rightmost derivation", and all the other stuff about grammars. Phew! --
drj
- I'll look soon (about to crash right now). Before I forget though, some programming language tools probably need mentioning: lex? and flex?, yacc and bison; there was/is something called pccts?, I think; ... --loh
![[Home]](wikipedia.png)