[Home]United Kingdom/Relationships

HomePage | United Kingdom | Recent Changes | Preferences

Difference (from prior major revision) (no other diffs)

Added: 77a78,79
::[English Monarchy]? would be good for a part of this list, but it should stop with [William III]? and point to another page called [UK Monarchy]?. Scotland could probably do the same trick -- independent page until 1701, then point to [UK Monarchy]?. The list of names on both would start overlapping with James VI/James I, of course.


The throne of England often did not pass smoothly from parent to child. Lack of heirs, civil wars, murders and invasions affected the inheritance in ways that a simple list of kings does not show.

In 1603 the [Union of the Crowns]? took place, combining the royal lines of England and Scotland. King James VI of Scotland became James I of England. Since then, a single monarchy has ruled the United Kingdom

The first half of the page should be under England/Relationships? if anywhere: and certainly a good 25% of the list weren't ruler of an England even remotely as we now conceive of it. Besides which it's a) a sub-page and b) an unrevealing page name: I was expecting to see a breakdown of diplomatic standings with other countries... sjc

Wouldn't this page be better called [British Royal Family]?, or something similar? -- SJK

There's a page called The Dutch monarchy. We should probably be consistant and call this [The English Monarchy]?. And flesh it out. --corvus13

[English Monarchy]? would be good for a part of this list, but it should stop with [William III]? and point to another page called [UK Monarchy]?. Scotland could probably do the same trick -- independent page until 1701, then point to [UK Monarchy]?. The list of names on both would start overlapping with James VI/James I, of course.


HomePage | United Kingdom | Recent Changes | Preferences
This page is read-only | View other revisions
Last edited November 2, 2001 7:24 am by Paul Drye (diff)
Search: