Shouldn't this entry be redirected to Yahweh, and then described there? Print encyclopaedias would do this, and with good reason. Just because we can make an infinite number of pages and hyperlink between them doesn't mean that we always have to do so. This is a case in point. (In fact, there are MANY duplicate Wikipedia pages that need to be brought together).
RK
---
is this a new (8/16/01) entry? see Yahweh and its talk, [Name of God in Judaism]?, and under the "Religion" header on the home page, God --MichaelTinkler
- Probably Jehovah, given that is the accepted form used by one not negligible religious group ([Jehovahs witnesses]?) deserves its own page. --AN
i've brought this article more in line with the one on
Yahweh. But it still feels somewhat weird. Needs more work. perhaps merge with
Yahweh? --
Asa
Don't the Jehovah's Witnesses assert that Jehovah is the
only legitimate name for God, as a point of distinction?
--
Wesley
- More than one religion places emphasis on the correct way to say the name of God. Mine doesn't: we figure He's smart enough to figure out when He's being addressed, and kind enough not to be picky about it. --Ed Poor
No-one is to stone anyone until I blow this whistle. Even - and I want to make this perfectly clear, even if they do say Jehovah.
![[Home]](wikipedia.png)