"Christological" points to
Jesus Christ--do we infer that "Christological" is jargon that simply means "of or relating to Jesus Christ"? --
Larry Sanger
- I 'spose. At least it wasn't one of the Pneumatological heresies. --MichaelTinkler
Yes, then we would have to go through the "pneumatic" drill. b-dum tss!! ;-) --LMS
Did the Aryans really invade India?
Yes, around 2000 B.C. they invaded and started making a civilization that produced many works of Hindu sacred literature such as the Rig Vedas and Upanishads. (feel free to put this on the actual page, or start a new topic)
Yes, the Arians lost at the church council, but (as the article notes) there are still Arians today. Is "heresy" NPOV? If not, is there a better term?
Vicki Rosenzweig
- Well, but none of these modern Arians or semi-Arians traces an actual connection to the early Christian Arians. It's a similarity or a 'nothing new under the sun' or a re-invention. "Heresy" is certainly problematic given the - ahem - 'broad' way we have defined things here. --MichaelTinkler
- I revised this sentence: The Jehovahs Witnesses continue to espouse a form of Arianism today, explicitly agreeing with Arius. It seems to imply that JWs have always existed and have continuously agreed with Arius. Nope. --MichaelTinkler
![[Home]](wikipedia.png)