[Home]History of Cavalry

HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences

Revision 6 . . (edit) November 10, 2001 2:12 am by Anders Torlind
Revision 4 . . October 17, 2001 8:37 am by Josh Grosse [Expansion]
Revision 3 . . (edit) October 17, 2001 8:20 am by Josh Grosse
  

Difference (from prior major revision) (minor diff, author diff)

Changed: 1c1
An army unit consisting of mounted soldier?s are commonly known as cavalry. Cavalry fight from the backs of their mounts, which most often are horses, camels. Infantry travelling by horse and fighting on foot is instead known as dragoons.
An army unit consisting of mounted soldier?s are commonly known as cavalry. Cavalry fight from the backs of their mounts, which most often are horses or camels. Infantry travelling by horse and fighting on foot is instead known as dragoons.

Changed: 3c3
Historically, cavalry is divided into light and heavy cavalry. The difference between them is primarily how much armour is worn by the soldiers, and thus how powerful their mounts must be to sustain the burden.
Historically, cavalry was divided into light and heavy cavalry. The difference between them was primarily how much armour is worn by the soldiers, and thus how powerful their mounts had to be in order to sustain the burden.

Changed: 5c5
The power of mobility given by mounted units were recognised in early history, but (arguably) cavalry became dominant on the battlefield only as stirrup?s were put into use. Cavalry became obsolete with the advent of modern vehicles with effective engines in the 20th century.
Before the Iron Age, the role of cavalry on the battlefield was largely performed by light chariots?. The power of mobility given by mounted units was recognised early on, but was offset by the difficulty of raising large forces and by the inability of horses (then mostly small) to carry heavy armour. In the armies of the Greeks and Romans it played a relatively small role, but was more important in the countries to the east, and horse archer?s were dominant on the vast Russian steppes for thousands of years.

Changed: 7c7,11
See also: Knight, Pike?, Military tactics
The decline of Roman infrastructure made it more and more difficult to field large infantry forces, and during the second and third centuries cavalry began to take a more dominant role on the battlefield, also in part made possible by the appearance of new larger breeds of horses. The appearance of the stirrup? allowed for the appearance of the heavy mounted knights, which were employed as shock troops, whereas earlier cavalry had to be consigned to the flanks. Knights remained dominant in western Europe until the rise of pike?men and longbowmen, and then musket?eers, relegated cavalry again to a supporting role.

In the 20th century the advent of modern vehicles with effective engines, such as tanks, rendered cavalry obsolete.

See also: Military tactics

HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences
Search: