[Home]History of Wine/Talk

HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences

Revision 2 . . October 12, 2001 8:49 pm by Clasqm
Revision 1 . . October 12, 2001 6:46 pm by DavidSaff [Removed a sentence]
  

Difference (from prior major revision) (no other diffs)

Changed: 3c3,5
I removed the last sentence, because it seemed to relate to French exclusivity over the term Champagne being "phased out", which I'm not sure is true. The sentence should be replaced by something less grammatically vague. --DavidSaff
I removed the last sentence, because it seemed to relate to French exclusivity over the term Champagne being "phased out", which I'm not sure is true. The sentence should be replaced by something less grammatically vague. --DavidSaff

What it boils down to is that USA can't easily be bullied by the EU into dropping names, while Chile, South Africa, Australia etc can. It's gone way beyond names of places, in recent trade talks, Italy was prepared to scupper the whole deal if South Africa didn't drop "grappa" for which there is absolutely no geographical referent. European (not just French) exclusivism is getting worse, not better -clasqm

HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences
Search: