History of Wikipedia is not a dictionary

HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences

	Revision 22 . . October 31, 2001 3:53 am by Larry Sanger [Moving /talk, which was really obnoxiously placed in the middle of the page, to the /talk page where it belongs]
	Revision 21 . . (edit) October 31, 2001 3:52 am by The Cunctator
	Revision 20 . . October 31, 2001 12:52 am by Stephen Gilbert [Any examples from September?]
	Revision 19 . . October 31, 2001 12:44 am by The Cunctator *[Examples of WINAD being used to delete stubs]**
	Revision 18 . . October 5, 2001 3:10 am by Stephen Gilbert
	Revision 17 . . (edit) October 4, 2001 11:10 pm by The Cunctator
	Revision 16 . . (edit) October 4, 2001 10:59 pm by The Cunctator *[Wikipedia is not a dictionary is being used as a justification to delete stub entries]**
	Revision 15 . . (edit) August 18, 2001 2:07 am by Tbc

Difference (from prior major revision) (no other diffs)

Removed: 9,15d8

Actually, the "Wikipedia is not a dictionary" philosophy is, as of September 2001, being used as a justification to delete stub entries.
:I haven't seen this happening, but that's not to say that it isn't. Any examples? -- STG

:See Quimby, Quagmire, Quintuplet, Quadruplet, Quiver
::The question was asked two months ago, when the comment was made. Any examples from then? --STG
::I hope you can understand that it would be difficult for me to find examples now. I apologize for not doing so at the time. --TheCunctator