[Home]History of Wikipedia contains spoilers/Talk

HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences
Revision 22 . . (edit) December 21, 2001 2:45 am by Cayzle [+ link to spoiler]
Revision 21 . . December 3, 2001 7:58 am by (logged).132.75.xxx [replies to Robbe]
Revision 20 . . December 2, 2001 9:48 pm by Robbe
Revision 19 . . October 5, 2001 3:47 pm by (logged).9.128.xxx [shifted from main page]
  
Difference (from prior major revision) (minor diff, author diff)

Changed: 1c1,3
Is the word "spoiler" sufficiently known outside the online-community so that "Wikipedia contains spoilers" is enough of a warning? I don't know English popular culture enough to decide.
Is the word "spoiler" sufficiently known outside the online-community so that "Wikipedia contains spoilers" is enough of a warning? I don't know English popular culture enough to decide.

:I believe it's obvious enough, personally, though like you I can't say for certain.

Added: 3a6,7

:I have no objections to spoiler warnings appearing on book and movie entries without any particular need for them. As a side benefit, it lets people get familiar with the policy. --Robert Merkel
HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences
Search: