[Home]History of Western canon/Talk

HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences

Revision 14 . . November 2, 2001 6:50 am by MichaelTinkler
Revision 13 . . November 2, 2001 6:48 am by (logged).111.13.xxx [copyright of harold blooms list; fair use; MichaelTinkler's paper]
Revision 12 . . November 2, 2001 1:09 am by Trimalchio
Revision 11 . . November 2, 2001 12:04 am by Stephen Gilbert
Revision 10 . . November 1, 2001 11:44 pm by Damian Yerrick [Can't include the list because of the Bono Act]
Revision 9 . . October 31, 2001 9:17 pm by MichaelTinkler
Revision 8 . . October 31, 2001 9:14 pm by Anatoly Vorobey [one good source]
Revision 7 . . October 31, 2001 8:38 pm by MichaelTinkler [plea for listmaking standard]
Revision 6 . . October 31, 2001 5:13 pm by (logged).109.250.xxx
Revision 5 . . October 31, 2001 4:54 pm by Tsja [better historical canon lists instead of a new one?]
Revision 4 . . (edit) October 31, 2001 6:52 am by Trimalchio
Revision 3 . . October 31, 2001 6:45 am by Trimalchio
Revision 2 . . October 31, 2001 6:29 am by (logged).111.13.xxx [why have rushdie but not plato? isn't a list like this just going to be an expression of personal opinion?]
Revision 1 . . October 30, 2001 10:16 pm by Trimalchio
  

Difference (from prior major revision) (no other diffs)

Changed: 31c31,32
I think if we included a copy of Harold Blooms list and other lists also, for the sole purpose of commenting upon them and comparing them, that would fit within fair use requirements I suspect. The other possibility is that we ask him -- he might not mind us including a copy, if we explain why we want to. Also, MichaelTinkler, about that paper you said you wrote years ago: could that be used in Wikipedia? Would its content be suitable? -- SJK
I think if we included a copy of Harold Blooms list and other lists also, for the sole purpose of commenting upon them and comparing them, that would fit within fair use requirements I suspect. The other possibility is that we ask him -- he might not mind us including a copy, if we explain why we want to. Also, MichaelTinkler, about that paper you said you wrote years ago: could that be used in Wikipedia? Would its content be suitable? -- SJK
:Yep, but it was very unambitious (it was a presentation write up for a seminar on What are the Liberal Arts/What? is a Liberal Arts Education?). I'll look around. It's fun to compare people's reading lists. --MichaelTinkler

HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences
Search: