[Home]History of Warsaw/Talk

HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences

Revision 3 . . August 14, 2001 9:05 pm by MichaelTinkler [*fake-ness]
Revision 2 . . August 14, 2001 9:01 pm by WojPob
Revision 1 . . August 14, 2001 8:18 pm by MichaelTinkler [*methods of restoration of Warsaw post '45]
  

Difference (from prior major revision) (no other diffs)

Added: 3a4,8




hmm. you mean what we professionally call 'inauthentic', an extremely problematic situation. Art historians are famous for dismissing reconstruction, but for not being able to recognize it without technical experts. I met the man who runs the workshop that handles all the marble on the exterior of the Duomo (cathedral) in Florence, Italy. He says that he hasn't run across a piece of stone older than the 18th century. It's skin is not 15th century (oh, and I don't mean the 19th century facade that's opposite the baptistery, I mean the flanks and apse, which are supposed to be earlier). I wonder if most people would get that impression if they didn't know the story? --MichaelTinkler


HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences
Search: