[Home]History of Titius-Bode law

HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences

Revision 8 . . (edit) November 7, 2001 7:43 pm by Zundark [Neptun -> Neptune, Wenus -> Venus, and link planets]
Revision 7 . . (edit) November 7, 2001 7:34 pm by (logged).130.25.xxx [Figure]
Revision 6 . . (edit) November 5, 2001 10:37 am by Bryan Derksen
Revision 5 . . (edit) September 27, 2001 2:40 am by Filip Larsen [Added a middle name to Bode link]
Revision 3 . . (edit) September 26, 2001 9:18 pm by Malcolm Farmer
  

Difference (from prior major revision) (minor diff, author diff)

Changed: 3,4c3,4
It was discovered in XVIII century by Titius and "published"
by Bode, thus the name.
It was discovered in 1766 by [Daniel Titius]? and "published"
in 1772 by Johann Elert Bode, thus the name.

Changed: 6c6
It states that the mean distance a of the planet from the Sun is in astronomical units:
It states that the mean distance a of the planet from the Sun is in astronomical units:

Changed: 22c22

Mercury00.40.39

Mercury00.40.39

Changed: 24c24

Wenus10.70.72

Venus10.70.72

Changed: 26c26

Earth21.01.00

Earth21.01.00

Changed: 28c28

Mars41.61.52

Mars41.61.52

Changed: 32c32

Jupiter165.25.20

Jupiter165.25.20

Changed: 34c34

Saturn3210.09.54

Saturn3210.09.54

Changed: 36c36

Uranus6419.619.2

Uranus6419.619.2

Changed: 38c38

Neptun--30.1

Neptune--30.1

Changed: 40c40

Pluto12838.839.5

Pluto12838.839.5

Changed: 46,48c46,48
  • There is no planet between Mars and Jupiter. However there exists the Asteroid Belt between Mars and Jupiter.
    (The first Asteroid. Ceres being discovered by Piazzi in 1801 with a mean distance of 2.77 a.u.)
  • There is no place for Neptune
  • There is no planet between Mars and Jupiter. However there exists the Asteroid Belt between Mars and Jupiter.
    (The first Asteroid. Ceres being discovered by Piazzi? in 1801 with a mean distance of 2.77 a.u.)
  • There is no place for Neptune

  • Changed: 55,56c55,56
    Here you can find a plot of this law against real planet distances:
    [1]
    Here is a plot of this law against real planet distances:
    http://rozeta.com.pl/~jochym/tblaw.png

    Changed: 58c58
    There is no theoretical explenation of the Titius-Bode law,
    There is no solid theoretical explanation of the Titius-Bode law,

    Changed: 60c60
    or a more fundamental cosmogonical rule.
    or a more fundamental cosmological rule.

    Changed: 62,64c62,70
    Recent discoveries of extrasolar planetary systems indicate
    that some form of this rule may be present universally. The
    evidence is too weak to draw any strong conclusions.
    Currently the most likely explanation is that orbital resonance from major orbiting
    bodies create regions around the Sun that is free of long-term stable orbits.
    Results from simulation of planetary formation seem to support that laws like the
    Titus-Bode law indeed is a natural consequence of planetary formation, according
    to the current theories in this area.

    Recent discoveries of extrasolar planetary systems also indicate
    that some form of this rule may be present universally, but the
    evidence is still too weak to draw any strong conclusions.

    HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences
    Search: