[Home]History of Space elevator/Talk

HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences

Revision 6 . . December 13, 2001 10:06 am by Bryan Derksen
Revision 5 . . December 13, 2001 9:26 am by (logged).192.137.xxx
Revision 4 . . December 13, 2001 9:24 am by Lee Daniel Crocker
Revision 3 . . December 13, 2001 9:09 am by Bryan Derksen [whoops. Thanks for the catch. :)]
Revision 2 . . December 13, 2001 8:58 am by MichaelTinkler [I like the entry - but the conclusion had to be removed.]
Revision 1 . . December 13, 2001 8:54 am by MichaelTinkler [relocated advocacy conclusion]
  

Difference (from prior major revision) (no other diffs)

Added: 7a8,9
:Good to hear a second opinion confirming my understanding of the situation. I did a bunch of editing on it as well, it'd be annoying to have it turn out to be illegal after all. :) -BD


Changed: 9c11,13
How about using fibers made of synthetic spider silk protein? I heard spider silk is stronger than kevlar.
How about using fibers made of synthetic spider silk protein? I heard spider silk is stronger than kevlar.

Unfortunately, I'd bet protein-based cables wouldn't hold up very well in the vaccum and hard radiation of space. Not to mention that spiderwebs have a high liquid-water content, necessary for their springyness and flexibility. A pity since it'd be really cool to string spiderwebs into space like that.

HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences
Search: