[Home]History of Sociology/Talk

HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences

Revision 7 . . December 7, 2001 3:18 pm by (logged).228.20.xxx
Revision 6 . . December 7, 2001 2:57 pm by (logged).228.20.xxx
Revision 5 . . December 6, 2001 2:04 am by Lee Daniel Crocker
Revision 4 . . (edit) December 6, 2001 1:59 am by Ed Poor
Revision 3 . . December 6, 2001 1:59 am by Ed Poor [request situational dynamics]
Revision 2 . . December 6, 2001 1:52 am by Lee Daniel Crocker
Revision 1 . . December 6, 2001 1:52 am by Lee Daniel Crocker
  

Difference (from prior major revision) (author diff)

Changed: 12c12
I'm not sure to whom I am speaking. But as an "old hand" on the internet as well, crackpot seems derisive, deleterious and more than overtly limited in its most demonstrative attempt at true crtiticism. I guess name-calling is the last bastion of the uninformed. LDC overlooks the fact that social dynamism has been a hallmark of multi-disciplinary studies of social dynamics and situational dynamics for over a half century. Perhaps if LDC took at look at the collected topics of Social Psychology, Aggression Theory, Studies in Emotional Arousal, and for that matter a host of articles too numerous to mention the light of illumination might burn away an indifferent veneer. Please, if deletions are to occur at least have them available for peer review...by at least someone somewhere capable of making an intelligent decision. Further, the ceramic nature of pscychology is an interesting concept. (LOL). I hope we can continue this discourse LDC and maybe come to some agreement upon which material is fodder for further dicussion, inclusion and who indeed may not be psychoceramic, but an "unschooled burro" of which other minds might glean a fitting demonstrative conclusion to your "criticisms".
I'm not sure to whom I am speaking. But as an "old hand" on the internet as well, crackpot seems derisive, deleterious and more than overtly limited in its most demonstrative attempt at true crtiticism. I guess name-calling is the last bastion of the uninformed. LDC overlooks the fact that multi-disciplinary studies of social dynamics and situational dynamics have been conducted for over a half century. Perhaps if LDC took at look at the collected topics of Social Psychology, Aggression Theory, Studies in Emotional Arousal, Cognitive Dissonance, Propoganda and for that matter a host of articles too numerous to mention the light of illumination might burn away an indifferent veneer. Please, if deletions are to occur at least have them available for peer review...by at least someone somewhere capable of making an intelligent decision. Further, the ceramic nature of pscychology is an interesting concept. (LOL). I hope we can continue this discourse with LDC and maybe come to some agreement upon which material is fodder for further dicussion, inclusion and who indeed may not be psychoceramic, but an "unschooled, or biolgically silent burro" of which other minds might glean a fitting demonstrative conclusion to LDC's interesting "criticisms".

HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences
Search: