[Home]History of Second Epistle of Peter

HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences

Revision 4 . . (edit) December 1, 2001 10:32 pm by MichaelTinkler
Revision 3 . . November 22, 2001 7:44 am by Alan Millar [comment on authorship]
Revision 2 . . October 22, 2001 2:20 pm by Alan Millar [wikify]
  

Difference (from prior major revision) (minor diff, author diff)

Changed: 2,6c2
is a book of the Bible New Testament.

The question of the authenticity of this epistle has been much
discussed, but the weight of evidence is wholly in favour of its
claim to be the production of the apostle whose name it bears.
is a book of the Bible New Testament, written by Peter.

Added: 13a10,14
Some have questioned whether Peter was the author, because
the linguistic style is simpler than the First Epistle of Peter.
Many scholars believe this is because Peter had assistance
in writing the first epistle, and therefore the second epistle
is actually Peter's own unaided writing.

Changed: 19,28c20,21
Christian tomb at Akhmim in Upper Egypt. Origen (obiit A.D.
254), Eusebius (obiit 340), and Jerome (obiit 420) refer to such
a work, and hence it has been concluded that it was probably
written about the middle of the second century. It professes to
give a history of Jesus' resurrection and ascension. While
differing in not a few particulars from the canonical Gospels,
the writer shows plainly that he was acquinted both with the
synoptics and with the Gospel of John. Though apocryphal, it is
of considerable value as showing that the main facts of the
history of Jesus were then widely known.
Christian tomb at Akhmim in Upper Egypt. Origen (died A.D.
254), Eusebius (died 340), and Jerome (died 420) refer to such a work, and hence it has been concluded that it was probably written about the middle of the second century. It professes to give a history of Jesus' resurrection and ascension. While differing in not a few particulars from the canonical Gospels, the writer shows plainly that he was acquinted both with the synoptics and with the Gospel of John. Though apocryphal, it is of considerable value as showing that the main facts of the history of Jesus were then widely known.

HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences
Search: