[Home]History of Sabbath/Talk

HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences

Revision 4 . . November 30, 2001 11:43 pm by (logged).219.214.xxx
Revision 3 . . November 30, 2001 11:07 pm by (logged).155.128.xxx [Extremely valuble commentary. Or not. Your Mileage May Vary.]
Revision 2 . . November 30, 2001 9:05 pm by MichaelTinkler [a different issue than Uriyan's]
Revision 1 . . November 30, 2001 8:58 pm by Uriyan [Language question]
  

Difference (from prior major revision) (no other diffs)

Added: 5a6,8
:: Well, I'm not a language scholar; but I'm a Hebrew speaker living in Israel, and I've studied Hebrew grammar at school (it is a part of the obligatory program of the Ministry of Education). Although Shabat does not fall into any of the "weights" through which nouns are usually formed (i.e. R-K-B (ride) with Quatelet pattern -> Rakevet "train") Shabat looks like it's formed from the root Sh-B-T (compare Modern Hebrew "shvita", "strike").
::BTW, I was wrong about "lashevet", "to sit", it's derrived from the root Y-Sh-B (it's probably related, but not the same). But unlike the weak Y in Y-Sh-B, I don't think that the A' in Sh-B-A' could disappear this easily. --Uriyan


HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences
Search: