[Home]History of Nicene Creed/Talk

HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences

Revision 4 . . December 15, 2001 12:52 am by (logged).153.24.xxx
Revision 3 . . December 15, 2001 12:45 am by (logged).146.101.xxx [... just curious ...]
Revision 2 . . (edit) December 14, 2001 9:51 pm by MichaelTinkler [respacing to avoid camelcase temptations]
Revision 1 . . December 14, 2001 9:49 pm by MichaelTinkler [note on liturgical-gender-avoidance]
  

Difference (from prior major revision) (no other diffs)

Changed: 7c7,8
That sounds like a "standard" use of inclusive language, like many of the changes in the New Revised Standard Version of the Bible. Is this a top-down change supported by some bishops, or a grass-roots thing that people are just kind of doing at the lay level? I know the American bishops don't always see eye-to-eye with the Pope on everything. --Wesley
That sounds like a "standard" use of inclusive language, like many of the changes in the New Revised Standard Version of the Bible. Is this a top-down change supported by some bishops, or a grass-roots thing that people are just kind of doing at the lay level? I know the American bishops don't always see eye-to-eye with the Pope on everything. --Wesley
:dunno. I think it's a movement that is concerted and propagated by lay and clerical groups without episcopal approval but often with the approval of diocesan-level officials - for instance, at diocesan conferences for liturgical planning, etc. Not that there aren't some bishops who are part of it, but it's never come to a vote the way the lectionaries did. The Roman Catholic Church is and has always been a lot less successful at policing practice than either its organizational charts or its critics make out. --MichaelTinkler

HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences
Search: