[Home]History of Natural selection/Talk

HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences

Revision 16 . . December 13, 2001 8:03 am by Lee Daniel Crocker
Revision 15 . . December 13, 2001 8:00 am by Lee Daniel Crocker
Revision 14 . . December 13, 2001 7:33 am by Slrubenstein
Revision 13 . . December 13, 2001 6:25 am by Lee Daniel Crocker
Revision 12 . . December 13, 2001 6:24 am by Lee Daniel Crocker
Revision 11 . . December 11, 2001 2:30 am by Lee Daniel Crocker
Revision 10 . . (edit) December 11, 2001 2:11 am by Ed Poor
Revision 9 . . December 11, 2001 2:07 am by Lee Daniel Crocker
Revision 8 . . December 11, 2001 2:00 am by Ed Poor [question for LDC]
Revision 7 . . December 11, 2001 1:56 am by Sodium
Revision 6 . . December 11, 2001 1:40 am by (logged).128.91.xxx [Response to Ed Poor]
Revision 5 . . (edit) December 10, 2001 11:48 pm by Ed Poor
Revision 4 . . December 10, 2001 11:47 pm by Ed Poor [Question for scientists (hello, LDC!)]
Revision 3 . . December 1, 2001 6:37 am by Ed Poor
Revision 2 . . November 30, 2001 5:33 am by Ed Poor
Revision 1 . . November 30, 2001 5:29 am by Ed Poor
  

Difference (from prior major revision) (author diff)

Changed: 52,53c52
"Deterministic" is probably not the right word. Of course Darwin does not posit that 100% of your ancestors chose to reproduce, but he does posit that 100% of them did, in fact, reproduce; and that this feature distinugishes them from the 99.99% of all organisms throughout history that did not. Anything that's "100%" is not, by definition, random. Selection is immediate, precise, an brutal. And the reasons one animal reproduces and another does not are not entirely random--there are genuine differences, and those differences change the odds. That's really quite simple. --LDC

"Deterministic" is probably not the right word. Of course Darwin does not posit that 100% of your ancestors chose to reproduce, but he does posit that 100% of them did, in fact, reproduce; and that this feature distinugishes them from the 99.99% of all organisms throughout history that did not. Anything that's "100%" is not, by definition, random. Selection is immediate, precise, an brutal. And the reasons one animal reproduces and another does not are not entirely random--there are genuine differences, and those differences change the odds.

Added: 54a54
Your version is much better. "Random" is a fighting word. :-). --LDC

HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences
Search: