[Home]History of Linguistics/Talk

HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences

Revision 12 . . (edit) November 15, 2001 6:12 am by Hannes Hirzel
Revision 11 . . November 15, 2001 5:46 am by Dmerrill [adamic language]
Revision 10 . . November 15, 2001 5:41 am by Hannes Hirzel [Note about [[Adamic language]] and [[Mormons]]]
  

Difference (from prior major revision) (minor diff, author diff)

Changed: 6c6
Neither etymology nor philology are strictly speaking areas in the modern study in Linguistics. Both these areas have nothing to do with making generalizations about Language with a capital L. For example, etymology studies specific words and their origins, but not the processes involved in a change. This later general discussion is part of Historical Linguistics.

Neither etymology nor philology are strictly speaking areas in the modern study in Linguistics. Both these areas have nothing to do with making generalizations about Language with a capital L. For example, etymology studies specific words and their origins, but not the processes involved in a change. This later general discussion is part of [Historical Linguistics]?.


Added: 19a20,21

:I thought so, but someone (don't remember who) said it was more than Mormons, although Mormons are the only ones who still believe it. Obviously more research needs to be done. It may also be linguists no longer use the term, but it was more widespread a few hundred years ago. Probably the info here in Linguistics will get more review and research then Adamic language. I'll be sure to copy any insights over, though. --Dmerrill

HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences
Search: