|
I second Micheal's request although I would like a reviewer from IELTS, if possible. I third it, although I've already removed the most misleading parts of the International English article. A reviewer from [IELTS] would be best, simply because that's what Aristotle wants. --Zundark, 2001 Sep 27 |
|
I third it, although I've already removed the most misleading parts of the International English article. A reviewer from [IELTS] would be best, simply because that's what ... wants. --Zundark, 2001 Sep 27 |
|
It is not pressing any longer. As Zundark has admitted he has already taken upon himself to act as he saw fit, unaware that requests for a review had been made. -- Aristotle :Aristotle, the way I see it 'requests for review' does not mean that we're calling in arbitrators, we're just hoping for some expertise. It's still wikipedia. --MichaelTinkler ::Rest assured that I'm happy for the page to be reviewed. I plan to write to various authorities myself and ask some etymology and English linguist history questions of some of the experts and organisations I've been tracking down and identifying. -- Aristotle Comments about the Provisional IRA and [neutral tone of voice]? in the Anti-Americanism/Talk page have shown that the Wikipedia could be said to be biased against the Provisional Irish Republican Army. I do see that bias myself, given the clear distinctions between the PIRA and the Irish Republican Army but I feel we should review this page to the emotive issues connected with The Troubles. |
|
:..., the way I see it 'requests for review' does not mean that we're calling in arbitrators, we're just hoping for some expertise. It's still wikipedia. --MichaelTinkler |
|
We should move this page to [Wikipedia article review requests]? or something like that. Other people can help me look for reviewers. :-) --LMS |
![[Home]](wikipedia.png)