[Home]History of Hypercomplex numbers/Talk

HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences
Revision 4 . . December 21, 2001 2:42 am by Taw ['unfortunately']
Revision 3 . . December 21, 2001 1:51 am by Gareth Owen
Revision 2 . . December 21, 2001 1:35 am by Zundark
Revision 1 . . December 21, 2001 1:26 am by Gareth Owen
  
Difference (from prior major revision) (no other diffs)

Changed: 5c5,8
I don't think so. They'd be more interesting, (and a darn sight more useful for things like 3-dimensional versions of complex-analytic inviscid 2D fluid dynamics) and it is unfortunate that they don't.
I don't think so. They'd be more interesting, (and a darn sight more useful for things like 3-dimensional versions of complex-analytic inviscid 2D fluid dynamics) and it is unfortunate that they don't.

They wouldn't be themselves if they were fields. And they wouldn't be any more useful,
as they would be incorrect. This 'unfortunately' is ridiculous. --Taw
HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences
Search: