History of HavenCo/Talk

	Revision 10 . . November 18, 2001 9:47 am by Stephen Gilbert
	Revision 9 . . November 18, 2001 5:21 am by The Anome [reply to accusation of paranoia]
	Revision 8 . . November 18, 2001 4:38 am by Ryan Lackey [paranoia]
	Revision 7 . . November 18, 2001 4:33 am by The Anome [Replied again]
	Revision 6 . . November 18, 2001 4:04 am by Ryan Lackey [questions answered.]
	Revision 5 . . November 18, 2001 4:00 am by The Anome [Replied to comment...]
	Revision 4 . . November 18, 2001 3:53 am by Ryan Lackey
	Revision 3 . . November 18, 2001 3:45 am by The Anome [Does the original article look like an ad to anyone?]
	Revision 2 . . November 18, 2001 3:44 am by The Anome
	Revision 1 . . November 18, 2001 3:41 am by The Anome [Added comment re HavenCo physical security...]

---

Difference (from prior major revision) (no other diffs)

Added: 68a69,70

I'm not convinced that it's necessary to explore the demand for a data haven in this particular article; perhaps that would be better suited to an article on data havens in general. If you're right about no one wanting a data haven, Anome, then HavenCo will go under. Time will tell. But I'd like to focus more on HavenCo itself, its relationship to that odd little place called Sealand, and possible attacks and on HavenCo's setup. And avoiding turning the whole thing into an advertisement, of course. :) --STG