[Home]History of Gospel of Barnabas/Talk

HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences

Revision 7 . . (edit) October 1, 2001 4:45 pm by Branden
Revision 6 . . (edit) September 18, 2001 11:21 am by Koyaanis Qatsi
Revision 4 . . August 22, 2001 2:12 am by MichaelTinkler
  

Difference (from prior major revision) (minor diff, author diff)

Changed: 1c1
Very interesting, this is a new one on me. I would wonder, though, how neutral it is, if indeed there are some (however biased and unreasonable) Muslims who are publishing it as genuine. We can convey the fact that most researchers believe it's fraudulent without committing Wikipedia to probability estimates ("almost certaintly") with which earnest, well-meaning (but almost certainly wrong, it seems) religionists would disagree. --LMS
Very interesting, this is a new one on me. I would wonder, though, how neutral it is, if indeed there are some (however biased and unreasonable) Muslims who are publishing it as genuine. We can convey the fact that most researchers believe it's fraudulent without committing Wikipedia to probability estimates ("almost certaintly") with which earnest, well-meaning (but almost certainly wrong, it seems) religionists would disagree. --LMS

Changed: 8c8,12
That's true. --MichaelTinkler
That's true. --MichaelTinkler


Omigosh. I decided I wouldn't wait to go by the library this afternoon and get my interlibrary loan books to look in the reference section. Do a google search on Gospel of Barnabas and you poke a hornet's nest. Not fun.--MichaelTinkler


The hyperlink in the article is broken. Darn. --Branden

HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences
Search: