[Home]History of Gnosticism/Talk

HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences

Revision 4 . . September 21, 2001 1:41 pm by (logged).247.216.xxx
Revision 3 . . August 21, 2001 6:53 pm by MichaelTinkler
  

Difference (from prior major revision) (no other diffs)

Changed: 5c5,43
well, it's not like we have any real idea about them - after all, it was a Secret. It's kind of like trying to write about the Mystery Religions - they're remarkably elusive! I've been reading French structuralist takes on the Eleusinian mysteries all summer and I have a headache. My only quibble (and I'm not about to do anything about it) is the "scholars think...equally valid." That's what always gets Christianity off track, listening to scholars. Every really good schism starts with someone writing a commentary on the book of Romans.... --MichaelTinkler
well, it's not like we have any real idea about them - after all, it was a Secret. It's kind of like trying to write about the Mystery Religions - they're remarkably elusive! I've been reading French structuralist takes on the Eleusinian mysteries all summer and I have a headache. My only quibble (and I'm not about to do anything about it) is the "scholars think...equally valid." That's what always gets Christianity off track, listening to scholars. Every really good schism starts with someone writing a commentary on the book of Romans.... --MichaelTinkler

Oh, the sacred mind. I was raised in Catholic grammar school
in the sixties and never knew there was this whole other stream
of interpretation about what the man called Jesus by the Greeks
was trying to tell us, and what sort of religion should emerge
from his being here. Only recently, when I read Elaine Pagels
The Gnostic Gospels (St Elaine I call her) and got a hold of
Nag Hammadhi Library in English, Robinson, editor, did it really
open my mind to what these people, second and third century,
Hellenistic Egypt thereabouts, were trying to get going.
Since this is an encyclopedia entry, anyone reading this
should understand something important:
The gnostics were a diverse group that came up with a
wildly imaginitive body of myth from both Hellenic and Jewish
sources, and the thing is NOT to take this or that myth
literally and stick to it like a cult member or something.
Whats important for us in the post rennaissance - post reformation
post enlightment and now post twentieth century to understand
is the way they did what they did. The vocabulary, the
quality of writing, the intelligence level, the depth of
imagination. The quote from Homer. The pagelong excerpt
from Plato's Republic. The prayer of thanksgiving
(nag hammadhi codex 6 page 63, page 329 in the Robinson
translation) where we give thanks
to You, undisturbed name, honored with the name
"God" and praised with the name "Father".....
...for giving us mind, speech and knowledge:mind, so
we may understand you....
I sound like I'm preaching here, but I just to inform
anyone looking up info in this index that this
religious community in late antiquity held the promise
of a religion that truly held the mind of every human
being to be a sacred gift, not just a machine or a
tool. A promise of course not yet delivered to humanity.
Another text is titled The Book of Thomas the Contender.
At's right, coulda been a contenda. But hope proves a
man deathless, said Melville.
John Joyce

HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences
Search: