[Home]History of Dubious historical resources

HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences

Revision 11 . . November 26, 2001 7:26 am by (logged).93.53.xxx
Revision 10 . . (edit) November 17, 2001 3:19 am by (logged).228.142.xxx
Revision 9 . . November 17, 2001 1:31 am by (logged).153.24.xxx [plutarch.]
Revision 8 . . November 17, 2001 1:29 am by Paul Drye [Tacitus!]
Revision 7 . . November 17, 2001 12:13 am by Sjc
Revision 6 . . (edit) November 12, 2001 7:27 pm by (logged).191.188.xxx
  

Difference (from prior major revision) (no other diffs)

Added: 10a11,15


Also in citing historical resources keep in mind that what may generally regarded as truth by one generation of historians, may
become extremely controversial by the next generation, who may not
only have more complete facts, but may also be looking at the situation with a different set of historical biases. Case in point, lots of things that have been written about Chinese history, in particular the post-Song "decline", anything about Zheng He, the 1911 revolution, the interaction between China and Europe in the 19th century, the interaction between China and Europe before the 19th century.


HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences
Search: