History of Computer virus/Talk

Difference (from prior major revision) (no other diffs)

Added: 11a12,13

You could, but I was mainly asking you to address my other criticisms: "I also don't think the bit about languages that viruses are written in is very useful; at best it's an overgeneralization." While I'm at it, you could choose to clarify the bit about removable media; companies accidentaly spread viruses by CDROM all the time. Or you could decide that nobody believes what you wrote (even though you do) and just delete it. Your choice. It's an anarchy. GregLindahl

	Revision 8 . . December 10, 2001 3:48 am by GregLindahl
	Revision 7 . . December 10, 2001 3:28 am by Taral [Clarify position]
	Revision 6 . . December 10, 2001 3:27 am by Taw [lameness]
	Revision 5 . . December 10, 2001 3:24 am by (logged).25.129.xxx [Virus vs. worm]
	Revision 4 . . December 10, 2001 3:16 am by GregLindahl ["seem to be confused" is a deliberate insult, right?]
	Revision 3 . . December 10, 2001 3:04 am by Taw [DOS]
	Revision 2 . . December 10, 2001 2:52 am by GregLindahl [Early days of DOS? 1950s? They had viruses on IBM mainframes?]
	Revision 1 . . December 9, 2001 1:26 pm by (logged).37.81.xxx [I think "computer virus" is older than 1985.]