[Home]History of Book of Revelation

HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences

Revision 8 . . December 17, 2001 10:58 am by MichaelTinkler [removing question to talk (where it belonged) and answering it there.]
Revision 7 . . December 17, 2001 10:40 am by Wesley [Revelation almost didn't make it into the New Testament canon, still isn't read publically in the East.]
Revision 6 . . December 17, 2001 8:08 am by RK [Lots of text added from 1913 Catholic Encyclopaedia, public domain]
Revision 5 . . (edit) October 7, 2001 10:21 am by (logged).136.2.xxx
  

Difference (from prior major revision) (no other diffs)

Changed: 5c5
It is definitely one of the most controversial books of the Bible, with many ranging interpretations of the meanings of the various names and events in the account. The identity of the author John is not completely clear. A traditional view is that the author of this book was John the apostle, but other scholars doubt that. The traditional Christian view is that this John was the same as the author of the Gospel of John and I, II, and III John. In the fourth century, St. John Chrysostom and other bishops argued against including this book in the New Testament canon, chiefly because of the difficulties of interpreting it and the danger for abuse. In the end, it was included, although it remains the only book of the New Testament that is not read publically in Eastern Orthodox Church. (Is it read from publically in the Roman Catholic Church, or otherwise included in any standard western lectionaries?)
It is definitely one of the most controversial books of the Bible, with many ranging interpretations of the meanings of the various names and events in the account. The identity of the author John is not completely clear. A traditional view is that the author of this book was John the apostle, but other scholars doubt that. The traditional Christian view is that this John was the same as the author of the Gospel of John and I, II, and III John. In the fourth century, St. John Chrysostom and other bishops argued against including this book in the New Testament canon, chiefly because of the difficulties of interpreting it and the danger for abuse. In the end, it was included, although it remains the only book of the New Testament that is not read publically in Eastern Orthodox Church.

HomePage | Recent Changes | Preferences
Search: