Well they're embarrassments too. Malmsteen is an embarrassment because he is the epitome of style over substance and gaudy flash over emotional or intellectual content. Oh, and the ego...
I'll be rewriting it considerably to put Malmsteen back into some sort of perspective. - MMGB
MMGB, you did a great thing here -- the original was lifted directly from Malmsteen's own website, which is surely not kosher, copyright wise. (Nor, as you point out, objectivity-wise!)
Can I ask you a favor? Can you be sure that your rewrite doesn't contain anything from the original, i.e. that this is not a 'derived work'? Having the same facts is o.k., and even relying on the original for some facts is fine, but the wording should be all Wikipedia. --Jimbo Wales
Jimbo - I rewrote every word - the only thing I cut and pasted was the phrase "19th-century violin virtuoso Nicolo Paganini" which I don't think is a copyrightable phrase. - ManningBartlett
Sweet. You've crushed my apelike illusions about the magesty of Yngwie's talent, though. :-) -- Jimbo Wales
Manning, thank you. I myself was so crushed by the majesty of his 'burning strat licks' in the previous version that I couldn't even begin to rewrite. (p.s., he's a representative of 'neo-classical metal', the Heavy metal page, says! Me, I'm a sucker for neoclassical anything.) --MichaelTinkler
This sounds somewhat fishy to me. Was there really no guitarist with such "prodigious technical fluency" before Malmsteen? (I don't know myself... Manning? Anyone?) --STG