Special relativity/Talk

[Tom Van Flandern]? argues that the [Lorentz Relativity]? theory, the primary competitor to special relativity, does a better job of explaining the Speed of gravity, and is suppored by all the existing experimental evidence that supports special relativity.

There are a hundred and three alternatives to special relativity, and next to noone takes them seriously. Discussion of the particular alternatives definitely does not belong on a main page like special relativity, any more than discussion of Velikovsky belongs on history or discussion of Nostradamus belongs on theology.