This page is directly created because those who feel
Christian Mythology should include works such as the
New Testament and
Old Testament. I feel that if 'mythology' is an appropriate word for those works,
then it is appropriate for most other scientific fields too. --
BenBaker
You make a valid point, but given the pro-science orientation of the wikipedia, it's unlikely that the
mythology label will wind up applied equally to religion and science. I tried mentioning two different usages of
mythology and someone put a disclaimer at the top of [religious mythology]
? but this looks like a long war to me. I'm going to remain on the sidelines for this one. --
Ed Poor
This is whacked. I appreciate your opinion that science can be wrong, but that doesn't make this npov. It's an incorrect use of the term mythology. Mythology, even when using the loose description of a story with symbolic and religious significance, doesn't apply to scientific findings, even if you disagree with them. Scientific theories are neither symbolic nor religious in nature. You can't go bending the language to suit your pet theories. Argue against using
Christian mythology (and you might start by suggesting something better but still accurate), but don't argue for Scientific mythology which is bogus. --
Dmerrill
The existence of the page seems reasonable; I came up with some real examples. The original contents, of course, is just malicious lies and has no place in honest discourse. --LDC
![[Home]](wikipedia.png)