[Home]History of Scotland/talk

HomePage | History of Scotland | Recent Changes | Preferences

Showing revision 7
I don't thnk that devolution has in any sense of the word reversed the union of the parliaments (may have diluted it a little though). Scots MPs still sit in Westminster and some policy is still decided at Westminster.


I agree that this is a little ambiguously worded, but I see what the author is trying to get at. It is a question of nuance: maybe something like 'a beginning of the disentanglement of the merged parliaments' would more accurately fit the bill. sjc


I don't think there was anything 'so-called' about the Highland Clearances. There is a considerable amount of highly convincing primary evidence which indicates that a) they happened b) were extremely brutal and c) affected a considerable number of folk. sjc
Let's see what the old Merriam Webster has to say:

so-called adj 1. Commonly named : popularly termed 2. falsely or improperly so named.

Given the remainder of the paragraph on the Clearances, I think it's clear which meaning of the term is being used. -- PaulDrye

Yes, there is an ambiguity here; certainly when someone says 'so-called' to me, though, I tend to think immediately in terms of definition 2, as I guess, would most people... sjc


I think a little background would be nice:
see [scottweb/clearances]
My apologies for cutting off the second half of the article - all I did was correct a link, but I got an error from the server after clicking save. Anyway, I take the blame --Dweir

HomePage | History of Scotland | Recent Changes | Preferences
This page is read-only | View other revisions | View current revision
Edited November 17, 2001 1:38 am by Dweir (diff)
Search: