Tim, just a reminder that wikipedia is a collaborative project; by definition it depends (as you should have noticed) on collaboration. It is therefore a place to cooperate with other contributors, and to try to reach reach consensual decisions, which is I think not what you did with ManningBartlett. I hope you'll allow discussion in the future--even when you're 100% certain you are right--as we do wish to keep contributors. And I hope Mr. Bartlett has the good graces to overlook your actions and continue contributing, though I recognize that many people would not. It is a challenge, I know; we've all had our slips. But please let's try to keep it civil. --KQ |
/Places
--- Tim, I shall "stop my f'ing name calling" when people stop using Wikipedia to blithely rewrite history. But what you call name-calling, I refer to as "calling a spade, a spade". Until people can deal with the historical record without rewriting it, I reserve the right to question their motives.
There is a saying: The modern definition of a racist is anyone who is winning an argument with a liberal. Your definition of an anti-Semite appears to be anyone who is winning an argument with you. This makes you look ridiculous and throws the value of your efforts here into question. - Tim
You should be ashamed for how you treat people.