Wikipedia: Systems engineering/Talk

Difference (from prior major revision) (minor diff, author diff)

Removed: 1d0

Questionable passages removed from earlier draft, and comments:

Removed: 3,27d1

An interesting fact is that the poor? design of the error-correction protocol stack of the Internet forces a requirement for error-rates of 1x10-11. This is often achieved by tunneling the the internet protocols through a more reliable protocol such as ATM (asynchronous transfer mode).

:This is not true. TCP will work reasonably well up to about 1x10-7, with slight degradation (0.12% packet loss on 12000 bit packets). In any case, it's fibre, not ATM, that is reliable. ATM has no EDC layer at all (unless you count cell header checksums)

The packets each have a checksum?, the sum of all the 8-bit bytes in the packet.

:No it's not: it's 16-bit one's complement checksum of the contents and a pseudo-IP-header: see http://www.networksorcery.com/enp/protocol/tcp.htm for details

In the internet, ICMP "pings" are sent by routers every 30 seconds or so. In the internet, when a ping fails, the router updates its routing table?.

:No, they're not pings: they're routing update messages.

-- The Anome

Thanks for the corrections. I think I need to qualify the remarks about the packet error rate. If an error rate above 1x10-11 is also coupled to a delay of three hundred milliseconds or more (i.e. a satellite link), I've heard reports that a packet storm of rebroadcast packets can occur, paralyzing the failing link until routers begin to avoid the congestion. A number of experimental and optionally-deployed protocols use more-selective packet retransmission to avoid this problem, which is a known defect in TCP caused by its windowed packet retransmission policy. Ray Van De Walker

See http://www.psc.edu/networking/tcp_friendly.html#performance
and specifically the paper http://citeseer.nj.nec.com/mathis97macroscopic.html
for
* a theoretical derivation of TCP performance vs. error + delay * mathematical modelling ditto
* actual measurements to back up the above.
-- [Tha Anome]?

Added: 33a8,12

--

I have moved the talk relevant to the moved material. It is now in the appropriate /Talk -- The Anome

This article is an excellent start. The bottom part should be probably move to another (new?) entry. I didn't do it, because I don't know yet where to move it. --HJH

'TCP performance' seems to be the subject, but where should it live? Under TCP? Or in a new article, 'Network protocol performance'? -- The Anome

I added subtitles and refactored the last part. -- HJH

I have moved the talk relevant to the moved material. It is now in the appropriate /Talk -- The Anome