[Home]Sexual intercourse/Talk

HomePage | Sexual intercourse | Recent Changes | Preferences

YIKES! I came here from the Prostitution page - surely we have to qualify the 'for reproduction' part of the statement if it's linked to prostitution! And what about all those - ahem - other activities. Not to mention homosexuality. If we keep this definition the way it is, prostitution should link to something else!

Seems to serve perfectly fine for that at least, although it DOES need some more content (notably homesexual intercourse). Feel free to add! :-) (oh, and by the way, it's dry and factual on purpose, in order to avoid bias)---Anders Törlind

Well, it's exactly that kind of attitude that had some people wondering what Bill Cllinton actually MEANT by sexual contact! --MichaelTinkler

I'm sorry that i have offended you, although i know not what i have done. Please accept my aplogies. --Anders Törlind

Not at all, Anders! I neglected to insert a smiley. The narrowness of Bill's definition of "what sexual contact is" is what it reminded me of. Procreation is obviously too narrow for the human, maybe the primate, and maybe even just plain mammalian description, homosexuality aside.


Sexual intercourse page revamped 5 November 2001


HomePage | Sexual intercourse | Recent Changes | Preferences
This page is read-only | View other revisions
Last edited November 6, 2001 5:17 am by 200.191.188.xxx (diff)
Search: