[Home]History of TraditionalAnarchism

HomePage | RecentChanges | Preferences

Revision 12 . . February 17, 2001 3:39 am by (logged).bomis.com
Revision 11 . . February 17, 2001 2:24 am by LarrySanger [* Rendered Richard's reply fact-stating without changing the substance. Get the idea?]
Revision 10 . . February 16, 2001 3:22 pm by RichardKulisz
Revision 9 . . (edit) February 16, 2001 8:08 am by LarrySanger
Revision 8 . . (edit) February 16, 2001 8:04 am by LarrySanger
Revision 7 . . February 16, 2001 8:03 am by LarrySanger [* Various edits. You may be interested in seeing http://www.daft.com/~rab/liberty/history/]
Revision 6 . . (edit) February 16, 2001 7:54 am by JimboWales [Just a spelling fix]
Revision 5 . . February 16, 2001 7:45 am by LarrySanger
Revision 4 . . February 14, 2001 12:19 pm by RichardKulisz
Revision 3 . . February 14, 2001 11:50 am by RichardKulisz
Revision 2 . . February 14, 2001 6:02 am by JimboWales
Revision 1 . . February 13, 2001 2:32 pm by JimboWales
  

Difference (from prior major revision) (no other diffs)

Changed: 9c9,10
A simple and common objection to anarchism is that any notion of communal control implies something akin to a StatE?. Anarchists reply that there is only a superficial similarity between the power hierarchies of and supporting corporations, on the one hand, and the layered division of labour in cooperatives, on the other. The State is created when private property is legitimized. By contrast, cooperatives, credit unions, and mutual aid societies are the principal instances of communal control and anarchists maintain that they do not involve the kind of authoritarianism found in corporations. If one compares both organizations using the items on the PsychopathyChecklist? as a guide then, an anarchist might hold, it becomes clear that cooperatives act like normal humans, humane, warm, feeling and stable while corporations can only be described as a psychopathic entity that cold-bloodedly uses workers for its own ends and acts on one impulse after another. As an example, one of the items on the PCL-R is "criminal versatility". Corporations have it, Microsoft demonstrates it when it buys companies expert in areas MS knows nothing about. In contrast, cooperatives cannot do this because it would violate their charters.
A simple and common objection to anarchism is that any notion of communal control implies something akin to a StatE?. Anarchists reply that there is only a superficial similarity between the power hierarchies of and supporting corporations, on the one hand, and the layered division of labour in cooperatives, on the other. The State is created when private property is legitimized. By contrast, cooperatives, credit unions, and mutual aid societies are the principal instances of communal control and anarchists maintain that they do not involve the kind of authoritarianism found in corporations. Anarchists argue
that co-operatives behave in a more humane, warm, feeling and stable manner, while corporations use workers for their own ends.

HomePage | RecentChanges | Preferences
Search: