History of SetTheory

	Revision 36 . . February 16, 2001 8:13 am by LarrySanger
	Revision 35 . . February 16, 2001 7:50 am by RoseParks [*My opinion..Dr.Sanger]
	Revision 34 . . February 16, 2001 4:12 am by LarrySanger [* This page has been massively refactored by someone. Is this OK? Please look.]
	Revision 33 . . February 16, 2001 4:09 am by LarrySanger
	Revision 32 . . February 16, 2001 4:09 am by LarrySanger
	Revision 31 . . (edit) February 15, 2001 8:20 pm by (logged).bomis.com
	Revision 30 . . February 15, 2001 8:18 pm by (logged).bomis.com
	Revision 29 . . February 14, 2001 2:29 pm by (logged).bomis.com
	Revision 28 . . February 5, 2001 5:26 pm by (logged).sm.luth.se
	Revision 27 . . February 3, 2001 8:16 am by JoshuaGrosse
	Revision 26 . . February 2, 2001 11:37 pm by (logged).sm.luth.se
	Revision 25 . . February 2, 2001 10:52 pm by (logged).sm.luth.se
	Revision 24 . . February 2, 2001 10:13 pm by JoshuaGrosse
	Revision 23 . . (edit) February 2, 2001 9:51 pm by (logged).sm.luth.se
	Revision 22 . . February 2, 2001 4:54 pm by (logged).sm.luth.se
	Revision 21 . . February 2, 2001 6:13 am by JoshuaGrosse [Oops]

---

Difference (from prior major revision) (no other diffs)

Added: 45a46,47

Well, then, something's got to be done. Actually, I like the above article. It's the sort of thing that's needed as an introductory article about set theory.