[Home]History of SeriousScholarshipTalk

HomePage | RecentChanges | Preferences

Revision 5 . . February 7, 2001 10:37 am by RoseParks
Revision 4 . . February 7, 2001 6:48 am by LarrySanger
Revision 3 . . February 7, 2001 6:37 am by JimboWales
Revision 2 . . (edit) February 7, 2001 6:01 am by LarrySanger [* Editorial: why serious scholarship is a good thing]
Revision 1 . . February 7, 2001 6:01 am by LarrySanger [* Editorial: why serious scholarship is a good thing]
  

Difference (from prior major revision) (no other diffs)

Changed: 15c15,22
I agree with that. LS
I agree with that. LS


And what about a discipline like Pure Mathematics? To begin with people with a serious interest in Mathematics DO NOT READ Mathematics books.

And then there is Language study - Again this is hardly a question of READING books.

I don't find this description of scholarship very comprehensive...I believe that each discipline has its own requirements for scholarship and expertise. RoseParks


HomePage | RecentChanges | Preferences
Search: