History of ActorS/Talk

	Revision 12 . . February 16, 2001 8:05 am by RoseParks [*My last word, I hope.]
	Revision 11 . . February 16, 2001 5:57 am by JimboWales
	Revision 10 . . February 15, 2001 4:36 pm by RoseParks [*Trying to havet the last word-Wait]
	Revision 9 . . February 15, 2001 4:04 am by JimboWales
	Revision 8 . . February 15, 2001 3:55 am by RoseParks
	Revision 7 . . February 15, 2001 3:54 am by RoseParks
	Revision 6 . . February 15, 2001 3:18 am by JimboWales [Just some comments]
	Revision 5 . . February 15, 2001 12:46 am by RoseParks [*Answering Anonymous Coward....]
	Revision 4 . . February 14, 2001 2:13 pm by LarrySanger
	Revision 3 . . February 14, 2001 1:41 pm by LarrySanger
	Revision 2 . . (edit) February 14, 2001 12:14 pm by LarrySanger
	Revision 1 . . February 14, 2001 12:09 pm by LarrySanger

---

Difference (from prior major revision) (no other diffs)

Changed: 42c42,43

that in tennis it really is true that the top tennis players would all be men, if all were to play in the same league. In order to have sensible competition, segregation is probably necessary. But why do we have separate awards for best actor and best actress? Even if men and women naturally tend to play different parts, there seems to be no reason why we should consider it difficult at all to decide if JuliaRoberts? or AlPacino? is the better performer in a given year.

that in tennis it really is true that the top tennis players would all be men, if all were to play in the same league. In order to have sensible competition, segregation is probably necessary. But why do we have separate awards for best actor and best actress? Even if men and women naturally tend to play different parts, there seems to be no reason why we should consider it difficult at all to decide if JuliaRoberts? or AlPacino? is the better performer in a given year. I guess we will have to agree to agree!!!

Changed: 50c51



 �<-MyBox?