|
Tim - in your capitalism article, "Recently capitalism has often occured of a wider, LibertariaN?? social theory that advocates the absence of political intervention from most aspects of society." Could you take a look at this and revise to reflect what you were thinking, if you don't mind? I would copyedit it for clarity's sake, but I cannot for the life of me quite figure out what you intended... -- AyeSpy Actually, the "recently" was my bit. It occured to me that capitalism is old and fairly mainstream in some countries, whereas libertarianism is new and controversial. So the often seemed misleading. Sorry if I broke it. -- JoshuaGrosse OK - I edited it to say what I think you meant. Tell me if I got it right. -- AyeSpy Tim, in AnarchY, you replaced the historical definition of the term with a propaganda definition that has no value. The propaganda definition is inaccurate since anarcho-syndicalists "opposes cultural, economic, and political institutions equally, often failing to distinguish between them" and so fall in the category of destroyers of society in the definition. The definition describes two groups, and then lumps anarcho-syndicalists with "anarcho"-capitalists in the wrong group. Further, I made no mention of government in my definition, because it's irrelevant. Anarcho-syndicalists aim to demolish government by not acknowledging it. To claim that "anarcho"-capitalists have equal claim to the term Anarchy as anarcho-syndicalists is a gross distortion of history. The latter have existed for more than a hundred years. The former about two or three decades. I do not think you understand Anarchism. Are you an anarchist or otherwise student of the movement? -- RichardKulisz |
|
Moved to AnarchY/AnarchyTalk |
/TimeLine /Places
![[Home]](wikipedia.png)