[Home]TheoDicy

HomePage | RecentChanges | Preferences

Difference (from prior minor revision) (major diff)

Changed: 5,11c5
The word is taken from the title of a work that supplied one theodicy, namely that this is TheBestOfAllPossibleWorlds?: the TheoDicee? by GottfriedLeibniz (q.v.). See also TheProblemOfEvil.




Yet another minor inquiry, to be deleted asap. I know what q.v. means, it just seems silly, since there's a link right there. I think in print you have to say q.v. to let people know that they ought to go look something up. Here, the hyperlink says that.
Maybe not, though. I have no strong opinion. :-) I just didn't
want to edit out the q.v. without asking.
The word is taken from the title of a work that supplied one theodicy, namely that this is TheBestOfAllPossibleWorlds?: the TheoDicee? by GottfriedLeibniz. See also TheProblemOfEvil.

<the following is a portion (partly edited) of LarrysText, further development is greatly encouraged>

A theodicy is a theory about why God allows evil to exist in the world. In other words, a theodicy contains speculations about God?s actual purposes in allowing evil to exist in the world. In order to be a successful theodicy, the purposes stated must be wholly consistent with the notion that God is all-loving. So what is called for is an explanation of the purposes that a loving God might have in permitting evil to exist.

The word is taken from the title of a work that supplied one theodicy, namely that this is TheBestOfAllPossibleWorlds?: the TheoDicee? by GottfriedLeibniz. See also TheProblemOfEvil.


HomePage | RecentChanges | Preferences
This page is read-only | View other revisions
Last edited February 14, 2001 1:44 am by LarrySanger (diff)
Search: