[Home]ExpertS

HomePage | RecentChanges | Preferences

Difference (from prior major revision) (no other diffs)

Changed: 1c1,3
It is not at all easy to say what an expert is. This is actually studied in EpistemOlogy under the general heading ExpertKnowledge?. On one account, put very roughly, an expert is a person who is (or, perhaps, is widely recognized to be) a reliable (see ReliabilIsm?) source of KnowledgeByTestimony? for other people.
It is not at all easy to say what an expert is. This is actually studied in EpistemOlogy under the general heading ExpertKnowledge?. On one account, put very roughly, an expert is a person who is (or, perhaps, is widely recognized to be) a reliable (see ReliabilIsm?) source of KnowledgeByTestimony? for other people.

Can be contrasted with CrankS, who think they know what they are talking about, but don't. And with AcademicElitism, a syndrome of those who think that ONLY they know what they are talking about, and no one else does.

It is not at all easy to say what an expert is. This is actually studied in EpistemOlogy under the general heading ExpertKnowledge?. On one account, put very roughly, an expert is a person who is (or, perhaps, is widely recognized to be) a reliable (see ReliabilIsm?) source of KnowledgeByTestimony? for other people.

Can be contrasted with CrankS, who think they know what they are talking about, but don't. And with AcademicElitism, a syndrome of those who think that ONLY they know what they are talking about, and no one else does.


HomePage | RecentChanges | Preferences
This page is read-only | View other revisions
Last edited February 7, 2001 6:42 am by JimboWales (diff)
Search: